Derriso v. Bank of Soperton
140 S.E. 383, 165 Ga. 193, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 350
This text of 140 S.E. 383 (Derriso v. Bank of Soperton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Derriso v. Bank of Soperton, 140 S.E. 383, 165 Ga. 193, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 350 (Ga. 1927).
Opinion
The evidence was without conflict, and required a finding that the deed of the petitioner was made to the defendant bank to secure the debt of her husband with knowledge of the bank. It was error to refuse a temporary injunction.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
140 S.E. 383, 165 Ga. 193, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derriso-v-bank-of-soperton-ga-1927.