Derriso v. Bank of Soperton

140 S.E. 383, 165 Ga. 193, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 350
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 18, 1927·No. No. 5910·Published

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The evidence was without conflict, and required a finding that the deed of the petitioner was made to the defendant bank to secure the debt of her husband with knowledge of the bank. It was error to refuse a temporary injunction.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Derriso v. Bank of Soperton, 140 S.E. 383, 165 Ga. 193, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 350 (Ga. 1927).

140 S.E. 383 (Derriso v. Bank of Soperton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.