Derricott v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Derricott v. State

30 S.E.2d 838, 71 Ga. App. 352, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 365

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 30, 1944

Docket30562.

StatusPublished

This text of 30 S.E.2d 838 (Derricott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Derricott v. State, 30 S.E.2d 838, 71 Ga. App. 352, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 365 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Tlie accused was convicted in the criminal court of Pulton County of operating a lottery, known as the “number game,” for the hazarding of money. The verdict of the jury was authorized by the evidence; and none of the rulings excepted to in the petition for certiorari show cause for a new trial.

The overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affk'med.

MacIntyre and Gardner', JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

Tlie accused was convicted in the criminal court of Pulton County of operating a lottery, known as the “number game,” for the hazarding of money. The verdict of the jury was authorized by the evidence; and none of the rulings excepted to in the petition for certiorari show cause for a new trial.

The overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affk'med.

MacIntyre and Gardner', JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 S.E.2d 838, 71 Ga. App. 352, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derricott-v-state-gactapp-1944.