Derrick Wayne McDonald v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 16, 2009·No. 03-09-00242-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00303-CR

James Thomas LaPointe, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 03-111-K368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant James Thomas La Pointe seeks to appeal a denial of his motion to

recuse in a habeas proceeding. The trial court’s denial of this motion cannot be appealed as an

interlocutory order. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(f) (denial of motion to recuse is reviewed on appeal

from final judgment); Arnold v. State, 853 S.W.2d 543, 544 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) (civil rule

governing recusal motions applies in criminal cases). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want

of jurisdiction.

___________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 16, 2009

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Derrick Wayne McDonald v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Derrick Wayne McDonald v. State (Derrick Wayne McDonald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnold v. State
853 S.W.2d 543 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)