Derrick v. State

406 So. 2d 48
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 25, 1981
Docket53226
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 406 So. 2d 48 (Derrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Derrick v. State, 406 So. 2d 48 (Mich. 1981).

Opinion

406 So.2d 48 (1981)

Charlie C. DERRICK
v.
STATE of Mississippi.

No. 53226.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

November 25, 1981.

Thomas L. Booker, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Bill Allain, Atty. Gen., by Marvin L. White, Jr., Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

En Banc.

ON MOTION

LEE, Justice, for the Court:

Appellant, Charlie C. Derrick, was convicted in the Circuit Court of Neshoba County, Mississippi, for armed robbery and sentenced to a term of forty years with the Mississippi Department of Corrections and he has appealed to this Court.

The state has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and has attached to its motion an affidavit of the Sheriff of Neshoba County that appellant escaped from the Neshoba County Jail on August 28, 1981, and is presently at large. The state requests that the rule in Jones v. State, 218 So.2d 705 (Miss. 1969), be modified to provide that an appeal be dismissed when an appellant escapes from custody pending his appeal in a felony case. The Court stated in Jones the following:

The new rule is that where a person is convicted of a felony and perfects an appeal to this Court and escapes from custody pending his appeal and is still a fugitive when his case is called for hearing on the merits such action shall be deemed an abandonment of the appeal and will be subject to a motion by the State to dismiss such appeal. However, such dismissal shall be subject to be reinstated on motion of appellant showing good cause therefor.
(218 So.2d at 706).

We are of the opinion that the motion to dismiss the appeal should be sustained and the rule expressed in Jones, supra, is modified in order to express the following:

The new rule is that where a person is convicted of a felony and perfects an appeal to this Court and escapes from custody pending his appeal such action shall be deemed an abandonment of the appeal and will be subject to a motion by the state to dismiss such appeal. However, such dismissal shall be subject to be reinstated on motion of appellant showing good cause therefor.

MOTION SUSTAINED.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James Gandy v. State of Mississippi
228 So. 3d 957 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2017)
State v. Hentges
844 N.W.2d 500 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2014)
Perry v. State
113 So. 3d 627 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2013)
Dc v. Dc
988 So. 2d 359 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2008)
Weaver v. Parks
947 So. 2d 1009 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2006)
Bargo v. State
217 S.W.3d 825 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005)
Hires v. State
882 So. 2d 225 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2004)
Hires v. State
856 So. 2d 438 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2003)
James Arthur Hires v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2001
Bolton v. State
530 So. 2d 1360 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1988)
Commonwealth v. Hurley
461 N.E.2d 754 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 So. 2d 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derrick-v-state-miss-1981.