Derrick Reyanrd Jones v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 24, 2015
Docket05-14-01262-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Derrick Reyanrd Jones v. State (Derrick Reyanrd Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Derrick Reyanrd Jones v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion filed April 24, 2015.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01262-CR

DERRICK REYANRD JONES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14-53159-J

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck

Derrick Reyanrd Jones waived a jury, pleaded guilty to possession of heroin in an amount

of four grams or more but less than 200 grams, and true to an enhancement paragraph alleging a

prior felony conviction. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(a), (d) (West 2010).

The trial court assessed punishment at twenty-five years’ imprisonment. In two issues, appellant

contends the trial court’s judgment should be modified to reflect the correct degree of the offense

and to add the name of one of the attorneys who represented the State. The State agrees the

judgment should be modified as appellant requests. We modify the trial court’s judgment and

affirm as modified. Although appellant was subject to punishment in the first-degree felony range due to the

enhancement paragraph, the offense for which he was convicted is a second-degree felony. The

judgment incorrectly states the degree of the offense is a “1st degree felony.” Likewise, the

judgment omits Blake Reyna as one of the two attorneys who represented State during the

proceedings. We sustain appellant’s issues. We modify the trial court’s judgment to show the

degree of the offense is “2nd degree felony” and the attorney for the State was “Brandie Wade

and Blake Reyna.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet.

ref’d).

As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47

141262F.U05

-2- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DERRICK REYANRD JONES, Appeal from the Criminal District Court Appellant No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F14-53159-J). No. 05-14-01262-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, Justices Bridges and Lang participating. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is MODIFIED as follows:

The section entitled “Attorney for State” is modified to show “Brandie Wade and Blake Reyna.”

The section entitled “Degree of Offense” is modified to show “2nd Degree Felony.”

Judgment entered April 24, 2015.

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Asberry v. State
813 S.W.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Bigley v. State
865 S.W.2d 26 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Derrick Reyanrd Jones v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derrick-reyanrd-jones-v-state-texapp-2015.