Derrick Johnson v. Richard Jackson

414 F. App'x 889
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 30, 2011
Docket10-3640
StatusUnpublished

This text of 414 F. App'x 889 (Derrick Johnson v. Richard Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Derrick Johnson v. Richard Jackson, 414 F. App'x 889 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Johnson appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal, following an evidentiary hearing, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in which he claimed that defendant used excessive force against him in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

Following careful review, we conclude that no Eighth Amendment violation occurred for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Shields, 207 F.3d 491, 495 (8th Cir.2000) (in excessive-force claim, core inquiry is whether force was applied in good faith effort to maintain or restore discipline, or maliciously or sadistically to cause harm); Choate v. Lockhart, 7 F.3d 1370, 1373 & n. 1 (8th Cir.1993) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.D. Jones v. Thuworn Shields
207 F.3d 491 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)
Choate v. Lockhart
7 F.3d 1370 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
414 F. App'x 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derrick-johnson-v-richard-jackson-ca8-2011.