Derrick Dewayne Marshall v. the State of Texas
This text of Derrick Dewayne Marshall v. the State of Texas (Derrick Dewayne Marshall v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-24-00035-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
DERRICK DEWAYNE MARSHALL, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH APPELLANT
V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM
Derrick Dewayne Marshall pleaded “guilty” to evading arrest or detention with a vehicle. In accordance with the agreed punishment recommendation, the trial court sentenced Appellant to thirty years in prison. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. The clerk’s record has been filed and the trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. The certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Appellant also signed a waiver of appeal. The clerk’s record does not otherwise indicate that the trial court gave Appellant permission to appeal. When the defendant is the appellant, the record must include the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right of appeal. Id. This Court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. Based on our review of the record, the trial court’s certification appears to accurately state that this is a plea bargain case and Appellant has no right to appeal. 1 See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). Because the trial court did not grant Appellant the right to appeal, we dismiss the appeal. All pending motions are overruled as moot.
Opinion delivered August 15, 2024. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
(DO NOT PUBLISH)
1 Appellant was not declared indigent in the trial court and as of the date of this opinion, no reporter’s
record has been filed because, according to the court reporter, Appellant failed to make payment arrangements to obtain the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c) (no reporter’s record filed due to appellant’s fault).
2 COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
AUGUST 15, 2024
DERRICK DEWAYNE MARSHALL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Appeal from the 7th District Court of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 007-0832-23)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.
By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Derrick Dewayne Marshall v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derrick-dewayne-marshall-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.