Derri Raye Lukasik v. State
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
August 8, 2018
No. 04-17-00799-CR
Derri Raye LUKASIK,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR9695 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Kenneth A-G Lukasik, husband of appellant, filed a motion for leave to file “amici curiae brief in support of appellant Derri Raye Lukasik’s appeal.” The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held the purpose of an amicus brief is to aid the court and such a brief “cannot be subverted to the use of a litigant in the case.” Booth v. State, 499 S.W.2d 129, 136 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973). The brief sought to be filed by Kenneth A-G Lukasik does nothing more than attempt to provide further support to the legal sufficiency issue raised by appellant’s attorney on appeal. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of August, 2018.
KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Derri Raye Lukasik v. State (Derri Raye Lukasik v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.