Derri Raye Lukasik v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 8, 2018·No. 04-17-00799-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 8, 2018

No. 04-17-00799-CR

Derri Raye LUKASIK,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR9695 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Kenneth A-G Lukasik, husband of appellant, filed a motion for leave to file “amici curiae brief in support of appellant Derri Raye Lukasik’s appeal.” The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held the purpose of an amicus brief is to aid the court and such a brief “cannot be subverted to the use of a litigant in the case.” Booth v. State, 499 S.W.2d 129, 136 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973). The brief sought to be filed by Kenneth A-G Lukasik does nothing more than attempt to provide further support to the legal sufficiency issue raised by appellant’s attorney on appeal. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of August, 2018.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Derri Raye Lukasik v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Derri Raye Lukasik v. State (Derri Raye Lukasik v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Booth v. State
499 S.W.2d 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)