Derrer v. Paulk

514 So. 2d 379, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2245, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10252
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 15, 1987
DocketNo. 85-2829
StatusPublished

This text of 514 So. 2d 379 (Derrer v. Paulk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Derrer v. Paulk, 514 So. 2d 379, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2245, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10252 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant Traffic Control Devices, Inc. in this negligence action is affirmed because (1) the sole claim of negligence in this case is the defendant’s alleged failure to fulfill its contractual duty to respond to all trouble calls and correct any malfunctions in a particular traffic control signal, and (2) the record affirmatively establishes, contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, that the defendant fulfilled its aforesaid contractual duty, and, therefore, was not negligent in this case as a matter of law. See Wentz v. Independent Life & Accident Ins. Co., 254 So.2d 368, 369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wentz v. Independent Life & Accident Insurance
254 So. 2d 368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
514 So. 2d 379, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2245, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derrer-v-paulk-fladistctapp-1987.