Derouin v. Roberge

9 R.I. Dec. 162
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedMarch 18, 1933
DocketEq. No. 11496
StatusPublished

This text of 9 R.I. Dec. 162 (Derouin v. Roberge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Derouin v. Roberge, 9 R.I. Dec. 162 (R.I. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

CHURCHILL, J.

The bill was brought to establish a trust and for an accounting.

The Court at the close of the hearing found that a trust for the benefit of creditors had been established and directed an account to be filed by the trustee.

The respondent in her brief has raised the point that all the creditors are indispensable parties to the bill.

As the matter is one which goes to the heart of the controversy in its present stage, the Court will entertain a motion, before further proceedings are had, that such creditors be made parties.

For complainant: Kennedy & Greene. For respondent: Edward F. Dwyer, Samuel H. Brenner, Henri A. Roberge, O’Brien, Corrigan & Boyle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 R.I. Dec. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derouin-v-roberge-risuperct-1933.