Derouin v. Discover Bank

543 S.W.3d 57
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 12, 2017
DocketNo. ED 105664
StatusPublished

This text of 543 S.W.3d 57 (Derouin v. Discover Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Derouin v. Discover Bank, 543 S.W.3d 57 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*58Elaine DeRouin (DeRouin) appeals from the trial court's judgment granting Discover Bank's (Discover) Motion to Dismiss Count II of DeRouin's Amended Petition asserting a claim pursuant to the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, Sections 407.010 to 407.130. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in granting Discover's motion and dismissing Count II of DeRouin's Amended Petition. Fenlon v. Union Elec. Co., 266 S.W.3d 852, 854 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm1 the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fenlon v. Union Electric Co.
266 S.W.3d 852 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 S.W.3d 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derouin-v-discover-bank-moctapp-2017.