DeRosa v. Workman

696 F.3d 1302, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19391, 2012 WL 3974496
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2012·No. 10-7084·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

This matter is before the court on petitioner’s Petition for Rehearing En Bane and/or Panel Rehearing. We also have a response, as well as a reply. The original panel has considered the request for panel rehearing, as well as the other pleadings on file, and that request is denied.

The entire petition, as well as the response and reply, were also circulated to all the judges of the court who are in regular active service. A poll was called, and a majority of the court voted to deny the en banc request. Consequently, the [1303] petition for en banc hearing is also denied. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(a). Judges Lucero and Hartz voted to allow en banc reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeRosa v. Workman, 696 F.3d 1302, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19391, 2012 WL 3974496 (10th Cir. 2012).

696 F.3d 1302 (DeRosa v. Workman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Underwood v. Royal
894 F.3d 1154 (Tenth Circuit, 2018)