DeRosa v. Valentino

14 A.D.3d 448, 788 N.Y.S.2d 369, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 582
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 27, 2005·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered July 30, 2004, which denied defendant Donahue’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although the injured plaintiff and defendant Donahue both testified that the vehicle they were traveling in was rear-ended by the Valentino vehicle, propelling them forward and causing a chain collision, defendant Ann Valentino’s testimony created an issue of fact as to whether her vehicle actually came in contact with the Donahue vehicle. These differing versions of how the accident occurred, and the possible contributions by the various defendants, preclude summary disposition. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeRosa v. Valentino, 14 A.D.3d 448, 788 N.Y.S.2d 369, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

14 A.D.3d 448 (DeRosa v. Valentino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

G.G.N. v. Ramos
2019 NY Slip Op 3137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Medina-Ortiz v. Seda
2018 NY Slip Op 227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Martinez v. Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch One, LLC
2017 NY Slip Op 2138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Nyala C. v. Miniventures Child Care Development Center, Inc.
133 A.D.3d 467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Lewis v. Konan
39 A.D.3d 319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)