Derosa v. Lawrence

18 F. App'x 14
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedSeptember 10, 2001
DocketNo. 00-1824
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 F. App'x 14 (Derosa v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Derosa v. Lawrence, 18 F. App'x 14 (1st Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a dismissal of her complaint for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Reviewing the dismissal de novo [15]*15we agree that plaintiff did not allege any basis for federal question jurisdiction, but appears to be attempting to appeal from a state court judgment, which she cannot do in federal district court. Her response to the court’s order to show cause also failed to offer any facts indicating that it is not a legal certainty that her claim involves less than the amount needed to sustain jurisdiction on the basis of diversity of citizenship.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Herian
D. Nebraska, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. App'x 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derosa-v-lawrence-ca1-2001.