Dernick Resources, Inc. v. David Wilstein and Leonard Wilstein, Individually and as Trustee of the Leonard and Joyce Wilstein Revocable Trust

Court of Appeals of Texas

Dernick Resources, Inc. v. David Wilstein and Leonard Wilstein, Individually and as Trustee of the Leonard and Joyce Wilstein Revocable Trust

DecidedApril 15, 2014

Docket01-13-00853-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Dernick Resources, Inc. v. David Wilstein and Leonard Wilstein, Individually and as Trustee of the Leonard and Joyce Wilstein Revocable Trust (Dernick Resources, Inc. v. David Wilstein and Leonard Wilstein, Individually and as Trustee of the Leonard and Joyce Wilstein Revocable Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dernick Resources, Inc. v. David Wilstein and Leonard Wilstein, Individually and as Trustee of the Leonard and Joyce Wilstein Revocable Trust, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-13-00853-CV Style: Dernick Resources, Inc. v. David Wilstein and Leonard Wilstein, Individually and as Trustee of the Leonard and Joyce Wilstein Revocable Trust * Date motion filed : April 7, 2014 Type of motion: Motion for leave to file agreed supplemental clerk’s record Party filing motion: Appellees/cross-appellants Document to be filed: Agreed record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant appellant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellees/cross-appellants’ motion for leave to file agreed supplemental clerk’s record is denied. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34 does not allow the parties to file their own agreed record directly with this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.2 (“By written stipulation filed with the trial court clerk, the parties may agree on the contents of the appellate record. . . . To request matter to be included in the agreed record, the parties must comply with the procedures of Rules 34.5 and 34.6.”). To the extent the parties believe that relevant items were not included in the clerk’s record previously filed with the Court, the the parties “may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellant court a appellate court a supplement containing the omitted item[s].” TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1).

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: April 15, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-13-00853-CV Style: Dernick Resources, Inc. v. David Wilstein and Leonard Wilstein, Individually and as Trustee of the Leonard and Joyce Wilstein Revocable Trust * Date motion filed : April 7, 2014 Type of motion: Motion for leave to file agreed supplemental clerk’s record Party filing motion: Appellees/cross-appellants Document to be filed: Agreed record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant appellant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellees/cross-appellants’ motion for leave to file agreed supplemental clerk’s record is denied. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34 does not allow the parties to file their own agreed record directly with this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.2 (“By written stipulation filed with the trial court clerk, the parties may agree on the contents of the appellate record. . . . To request matter to be included in the agreed record, the parties must comply with the procedures of Rules 34.5 and 34.6.”). To the extent the parties believe that relevant items were not included in the clerk’s record previously filed with the Court, the the parties “may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellant court a appellate court a supplement containing the omitted item[s].” TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1).

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: April 15, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Dernick Resources, Inc. v. David Wilstein and Leonard Wilstein, Individually and as Trustee of the Leonard and Joyce Wilstein Revocable Trust, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dernick-resources-inc-v-david-wilstein-and-leonard-texapp-2014.