Dernham v. Lieuallen

Idaho Supreme Court

Dernham v. Lieuallen

43 P. 74, 4 Idaho 528, 1895 Ida. LEXIS 67

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 14, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 P. 74 (Dernham v. Lieuallen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dernham v. Lieuallen, 43 P. 74, 4 Idaho 528, 1895 Ida. LEXIS 67 (Idaho 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

This is a petition for the allowance of a bill of exceptions, claimed to have been brought under the provisions of section 4432 of the Revised Statutes, for the ■allowance of a bill of exceptions on behalf of the defendant. Paragraph 1, rule 12, of the rules of this court, provides that the petition must be filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days after such refusal, and a copy of the petition served upon the adverse party, and that the facts may be presented by certified copies of the record, stenographer’s notes duly verified or affidavits, and, if necessary, oral testimony. 'The petition was served and filed in proper time. The petition is submitted without brief or oral argument on behalf of ■either of the parties. The petitioner prays for the settlement ■of his bill of exceptions, “as set out in exhibit No. 7, herewith submitted,” and fails to submit said exhibit. There are only .six exhibits submitted with the petition, numbered from 1 to ■6. The proposed bill of exceptions is neither of the six. We therefore cannot settle the proposed bill of exceptions, for the reason that it is not before us. The application is not allowed, for that reason.

Morgan, C. J., and Huston, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SULLIVAN, J.

This is a petition for the allowance of a bill of exceptions, claimed to have been brought under the provisions of section 4432 of the Revised Statutes, for the ■allowance of a bill of exceptions on behalf of the defendant. Paragraph 1, rule 12, of the rules of this court, provides that the petition must be filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days after such refusal, and a copy of the petition served upon the adverse party, and that the facts may be presented by certified copies of the record, stenographer’s notes duly verified or affidavits, and, if necessary, oral testimony. 'The petition was served and filed in proper time. The petition is submitted without brief or oral argument on behalf of ■either of the parties. The petitioner prays for the settlement ■of his bill of exceptions, “as set out in exhibit No. 7, herewith submitted,” and fails to submit said exhibit. There are only .six exhibits submitted with the petition, numbered from 1 to ■6. The proposed bill of exceptions is neither of the six. We therefore cannot settle the proposed bill of exceptions, for the reason that it is not before us. The application is not allowed, for that reason.

Morgan, C. J., and Huston, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 P. 74, 4 Idaho 528, 1895 Ida. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dernham-v-lieuallen-idaho-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack