DERMODY, BRIAN S. v. TILTON, DARRYL D.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DERMODY, BRIAN S. v. TILTON, DARRYL D.. Read the opinion of the Court — 85 A.D.3d 1682
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 17, 2011·No. CA 11-00925·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

734.2 CA 11-00925 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND GORSKI, JJ.

BRIAN S. DERMODY AND GINA V. DERMODY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

DARRYL D. TILTON, SANDRA J. TILTON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

OHL & ALEXSON, HONEOYE (WAYNE I. OHL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

THE BROCKLEBANK FIRM, CANANDAIGUA (DEREK G. BROCKLEBANK OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (William F. Kocher, A.J.), dated August 24, 2010. The decision concluded that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against defendants Darryl D. Tilton and Sandra J. Tilton should be granted.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Pecora v Lawrence, 28 AD3d 1136, 1137).

Entered: June 17, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DERMODY, BRIAN S. v. TILTON, DARRYL D., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

DERMODY, BRIAN S. v. TILTON, DARRYL D. (DERMODY, BRIAN S. v. TILTON, DARRYL D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pecora v. Lawrence
28 A.D.3d 1136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)