Dermitt v. Delessert, Cordier & Co.

California Supreme Court

Dermitt v. Delessert, Cordier & Co.

1 Cal. Unrep. 12

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 22, 1856

DocketNo. 864

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 12 (Dermitt v. Delessert, Cordier & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dermitt v. Delessert, Cordier & Co., 1 Cal. Unrep. 12 (Cal. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

HEYDENFELDT, J.

— "When the judgment was first rendered the finding of facts and conclusions of law were abundantly sufficient to support the judgment. Upon the final decision it is only ordered that the first judgment “shall stand,” thus adopting also the findings upon which it was rendered.

There is not only no error in this, but it is in strict accordance with the intention of the parties when they entered into the stipulation to set aside the first judgment and obtained the opinion of the court upon the defense.

Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent damages.

I concur: Terry, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HEYDENFELDT, J.

— "When the judgment was first rendered the finding of facts and conclusions of law were abundantly sufficient to support the judgment. Upon the final decision it is only ordered that the first judgment “shall stand,” thus adopting also the findings upon which it was rendered.

There is not only no error in this, but it is in strict accordance with the intention of the parties when they entered into the stipulation to set aside the first judgment and obtained the opinion of the court upon the defense.

Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent damages.

I concur: Terry, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Unrep. 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dermitt-v-delessert-cordier-co-cal-1856.