Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/DERKOVIC v. State

DERKOVIC v. State

30 So. 3d 705, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3914, 2010 WL 1131449
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 26, 2010
Docket5D10-330
StatusPublished

This text of 30 So. 3d 705 (DERKOVIC v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DERKOVIC v. State, 30 So. 3d 705, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3914, 2010 WL 1131449 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Maya Derkovic, seeks a belated appeal of a judgment and sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). The instant petition is facially insufficient because it does not allege that Derkovic timely requested that her counsel file an appeal. See Lincoln v. State, 948 So.2d 77 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). Petitioner was given an opportunity to amend the petition to allege that she timely requested an appeal, but failed to do so.

PETITION DISMISSED.

GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lincoln v. State
948 So. 2d 77 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 So. 3d 705, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3914, 2010 WL 1131449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derkovic-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.