Deringer's administrator v. Deringer's administrator

Superior Court of Delaware

Deringer's administrator v. Deringer's administrator

10 Del. 528

DecidedJuly 1, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Del. 528 (Deringer's administrator v. Deringer's administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deringer's administrator v. Deringer's administrator, 10 Del. 528 (Del. Ct. App. 1879).

Pincite

Opinions

Higgins

(Spruanee with him) replied that it had been decided by the highest court in the State that this corporation is competent to maintain this action in this court as the administrator of Theophilus T. Deringer, deceased, duly appointed in the State of Pennsylvania under its act of incorporation in that State, and this being a debt due to it as such, the probate could be and had been probably made by it in such a case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higgins

(Spruanee with him) replied that it had been decided by the highest court in the State that this corporation is competent to maintain this action in this court as the administrator of Theophilus T. Deringer, deceased, duly appointed in the State of Pennsylvania under its act of incorporation in that State, and this being a debt due to it as such, the probate could be and had been probably made by it in such a case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Del. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deringers-administrator-v-deringers-administrator-delsuperct-1879.