Deringer's administrator v. Deringer's administrator

Superior Court of Delaware

Deringer's administrator v. Deringer's administrator

10 Del. 528

Superior Court of Delaware·Decided July 1, 1879·Published

Opinions

Higgins

(Spruanee with him) replied that it had been decided by the highest court in the State that this corporation is competent to maintain this action in this court as the administrator of Theophilus T. Deringer, deceased, duly appointed in the State of Pennsylvania under its act of incorporation in that State, and this being a debt due to it as such, the probate could be and had been probably made by it in such a case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Higgins

(Spruanee with him) replied that it had been decided by the highest court in the State that this corporation is competent to maintain this action in this court as the administrator of Theophilus T. Deringer, deceased, duly appointed in the State of Pennsylvania under its act of incorporation in that State, and this being a debt due to it as such, the probate could be and had been probably made by it in such a case.

Deringer's administrator v. Deringer's administrator, 10 Del. 528 (Del. Ct. App. 1879).

Pincite

10 Del. 528 (Deringer's administrator v. Deringer's administrator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.