Deringer v. Coxe

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Deringer v. Coxe

10 A. 412, 6 Sadler 283, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 696

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 25, 1887

DocketNo. 407, E. D.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 A. 412 (Deringer v. Coxe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deringer v. Coxe, 10 A. 412, 6 Sadler 283, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 696 (Pa. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Pbr Curiam:

We have given to the evidence in this case a due examination, and to the able argument of the counsel for the plaintiffs a care[291]*291ful consideration. The validity of the tax sales depended upon facts proper to be submitted to the jury. Those facts were clearly and correctly submitted. We discover no error in the rejection of evidence, nor in the answers to tbe points submitted. We find no jnst cause for reversing tbe judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pbr Curiam:

We have given to the evidence in this case a due examination, and to the able argument of the counsel for the plaintiffs a care[291]*291ful consideration. The validity of the tax sales depended upon facts proper to be submitted to the jury. Those facts were clearly and correctly submitted. We discover no error in the rejection of evidence, nor in the answers to tbe points submitted. We find no jnst cause for reversing tbe judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A. 412, 6 Sadler 283, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deringer-v-coxe-pa-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack