Derik Lin James v. State
This text of Derik Lin James v. State (Derik Lin James v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 5, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-11-00324-CR
DERIK LIN JAMES, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 338th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1230480
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant entered a guilty plea to driving while intoxicated with a passenger under the age of fifteen. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for two years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, suspended for two years. Subsequently, the State moved to revoke appellant’s community supervision. The trial court granted the motion and on February 24, 2011, sentenced appellant to confinement for seven months in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a fine of $100. No motion for new trial was filed. Appellant’s pro se notice of appeal was not filed until April 7, 2011.
A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Appellant’s notice of appeal was due March 28, 2011. The record reflects appellant dated his notice of appeal “3-31-2011.” The envelope has a handwritten date of “04/03/11” and it was postmarked April 5th or 6th, 2011. Even if we considered these dates, none are timely.
Although the date of filing is within fifteen days after the deadline, no motion for extension of time was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. In a criminal case, a late notice of appeal will not invoke our jurisdiction unless a motion for extension of time is also filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App.1996).
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Jamison and McCally.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Derik Lin James v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derik-lin-james-v-state-texapp-2011.