Derickson v. McCardle

2 How. Pr. 196
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1846
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 How. Pr. 196 (Derickson v. McCardle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Derickson v. McCardle, 2 How. Pr. 196 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Opinion

Jewett, Justice.

Denied the motion with $7 costs, on the ground that it appeared McCardle did not wish to defend the suit, or to have the motion *made, and defendant’s attorney must have known it. If defendant’s attorney had been served with the written notice of countermand, signed by McCardle, before making the motion, he should have ordered him (defendant’s attorney) to pay the costs of the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reynolds v. Maramorosch
208 Misc. 626 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 How. Pr. 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derickson-v-mccardle-nysupct-1846.