Derickson v. Cameron

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Derickson v. Cameron

2 Del. Cas. 623, 1821 Del. LEXIS 16

DecidedJuly 23, 1821

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Del. Cas. 623 (Derickson v. Cameron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Derickson v. Cameron, 2 Del. Cas. 623, 1821 Del. LEXIS 16 (Del. Ct. App. 1821).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Chancellor.

This application of Mr. Rust must be dismissed. Mr. Rust had notice before the sale at the time he filed his former objections; beside Mr. Rust is out of time. The decree for the confirmation cannot be altered but upon very strong grounds, and for want of knowledge of some fact which was not then in the party’s power. This want of title as it is alleged was fully known to Mr. Rust, and for some cause, negligence, almost if not wilful forgetfulness, he omitted then to make it ¿ part of his exceptions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Chancellor.

This application of Mr. Rust must be dismissed. Mr. Rust had notice before the sale at the time he filed his former objections; beside Mr. Rust is out of time. The decree for the confirmation cannot be altered but upon very strong grounds, and for want of knowledge of some fact which was not then in the party’s power. This want of title as it is alleged was fully known to Mr. Rust, and for some cause, negligence, almost if not wilful forgetfulness, he omitted then to make it ¿ part of his exceptions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Del. Cas. 623, 1821 Del. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derickson-v-cameron-delch-1821.