Derf Cattle Co. v. Colpac International, Inc.

463 So. 2d 430, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 321, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12238
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 1985·No. No. 84-1452·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Applying the principle that the fact that one is acting as a corporate representative does not insulate him from individual liability for his tortious acts, we reverse the judgment below which dismissed the complaint for conversion and fraud and mispre-sentation as against the defendant-appellee Swartz. Naranja Lakes Condominium No. One, Inc. v. Rizzo, 422 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Orlovsky v. Solid Surf, Inc., 405 So.2d 1363 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Adams v. Brickell Townhouse, Inc., 388 So.2d 1279 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction Co., 135 So.2d 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Derf Cattle Co. v. Colpac International, Inc., 463 So. 2d 430, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 321, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12238 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

463 So. 2d 430 (Derf Cattle Co. v. Colpac International, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bay View Inn, Inc. v. Friedman
545 So. 2d 417 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)