Derello 37292 v. McAdorey
Opinion
1 WO MDR 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Douglas W. Derello, No. CV 19-05884-PHX-MTL (JFM) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 McAdorey, et al., 13 Defendants.
14 15 On December 19, 2019, Plaintiff Douglas W. Derello, who is confined in the 16 Arizona State Prison Complex-Eyman in Florence, Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights 17 Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In a January 15, 2020 Order, the Court gave 18 Plaintiff thirty days to either pay the filing and administrative fees or file an Application to 19 Proceed In Forma Pauperis. 20 On March 3, 2020, Plaintiff paid the filing and administrative fees. In a March 9, 21 2020 Order, the Court dismissed the Complaint because Plaintiff had failed to state a claim. 22 The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint that cured the deficiencies 23 identified in the Order. 24 On March 19, 2020, Plaintiff filed his Motion to Explain Reason for Not Using 25 Court Issued Document and a First Amended Complaint. In his Motion, Plaintiff explained 26 that he did not use the court-approved form because the “only legible way [for him] to 27 communicate is through the Court Order use of a computer.” In a March 23, 2020 Order, 28 the Court granted the Motion to the extent Plaintiff was requesting the Court accept his 1 First Amended Complaint despite it not being on the court-approved form. The Court 2 dismissed the First Amended Complaint because it did not comply with Rule 7.1(b) of the 3 Local Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 4 gave Plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended complaint that cured the deficiencies 5 identified in the Order. 6 On April 23, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. On April 30, 2020, 7 he filed a Third Amended Complaint. 8 I. Plaintiff’s Request for Relief is Unreadable 9 Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint is typed, except for the last page, which 10 contains Plaintiff’s signature and an illegible handwritten Request for Relief. Because 11 there is no way the Court or Defendants could discern what relief Plaintiff is seeking, the 12 Court will direct Plaintiff to file a typed Request for Relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(3) 13 (“A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain . . . a demand for the relief sought, 14 which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 12(e) (authorizing a party to “move for a more definite statement of a pleading . . . which 16 is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably prepare a response ”); see also 17 Cobb v. Marshall, 481 F. Supp. 2d 1248, 1259 (M.D. Ala. 2007) (“the court has the 18 ‘inherent authority’ to act on its own and sua sponte direct a plaintiff to replead a 19 complaint.” (quoting Fikes v. City of Daphne, 79 F.3d 1079, 1083 n.6 (11th Cir.1996)). 20 II. Warnings 21 A. Address Changes 22 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 23 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 24 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 25 action. 26 B. Possible Dismissal 27 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 28 warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an action for failure comply with any order of the Court). 3| ITIS ORDERED: 4 (1) Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a typed Request 5 | for Relief. 6 (2) If Plaintiff fails to file a typed Request for Relief within 30 days, the Clerk 7 | of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without 8 | prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. 9 Dated this 6th day of May, 2020. 10 Wicked T. diburde Michael T. Liburdi 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Derello 37292 v. McAdorey (Derello 37292 v. McAdorey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.