Derek Schaefer v. Megan M. Schaefer

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 29, 2010·No. 02-09-00359-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-359-CV

DEREK SCHAEFER                                                               APPELLANT

                                                   V.

MEGAN M. SCHAEFER                                                            APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

On June 15, 2010, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.  We have not received any response.


Because appellant=s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM             

PANEL:  GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  July 29, 2010



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Derek Schaefer v. Megan M. Schaefer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Derek Schaefer v. Megan M. Schaefer (Derek Schaefer v. Megan M. Schaefer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.