Derek Schaefer v. Megan M. Schaefer
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-359-CV
DEREK SCHAEFER APPELLANT
V.
MEGAN M. SCHAEFER APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
On June 15, 2010, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant=s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: July 29, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Derek Schaefer v. Megan M. Schaefer (Derek Schaefer v. Megan M. Schaefer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.