Derek & Matthew Bissette Farms v. Bissett Produce, Inc.
This text of Derek & Matthew Bissette Farms v. Bissett Produce, Inc. (Derek & Matthew Bissette Farms v. Bissett Produce, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1149
DEREK & MATTHEW BISSETTE FARMS; BRANTLEY FARMS, INC.; ERW FARMS, LLC; NICHOLS & NICHOLS FARMS, INC.; ROCK RIDGE FARMS PARTNERSHIP,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
BISSETT PRODUCE, INC.; AGCAROLINA FARM CREDIT, ACA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00451-FL)
Submitted: July 30, 2015 Decided: August 18, 2015
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen P. McCarron, Kate Ellis, McCARRON & DIESS, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Lisa P. Sumner, Jill C. Walters, Andrew H. Erteschik, POYNER SPRUILL LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jason L. Hendren, Rebecca F. Redwine, HENDREN & MALONE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Lawrence H. Meuers, MEUERS LAW FIRM, PL, Naples, Florida, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Derek & Matthew Bissette Farms, Brantley Farms, Inc., ERW
Farms, LLC, Nichols & Nichols Farms, Inc., and Rock Ridge Farms
Partnership appeal from the district court’s order affirming the
bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their complaint filed in the
underlying bankruptcy proceeding, seeking to assert certain
rights under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7
U.S.C. §§ 499a-499t (2012). We have reviewed the record included
on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
courts below. Derek & Matthew Bissette Farms v. Bissett Produce,
Inc., No. 5:14-cv-00451-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2015). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Derek & Matthew Bissette Farms v. Bissett Produce, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derek-matthew-bissette-farms-v-bissett-produce-inc-ca4-2015.