DeRedonda v. Harlan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DeRedonda v. Harlan

172 So. 2d 16

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 1965

DocketNo. 64-439

StatusPublished

This text of 172 So. 2d 16 (DeRedonda v. Harlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeRedonda v. Harlan, 172 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a final judgment entered in favor of the defendants pursuant to a jury verdict, in a wrongful death action.

Appellant contends: (1) that the court erred in refusing to hear certain testimony as to the ability of the defendant to have avoided the accident; (2) that the jury charges which were given were confusing and misleading on the last clear chance doctrine and in part erroneous as a matter of law.

We have carefully considered appellant’s, contentions in the light of the record, briefs, and oral arguments and concluded that no reversible error exists. Accordingly we must affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a final judgment entered in favor of the defendants pursuant to a jury verdict, in a wrongful death action.

Appellant contends: (1) that the court erred in refusing to hear certain testimony as to the ability of the defendant to have avoided the accident; (2) that the jury charges which were given were confusing and misleading on the last clear chance doctrine and in part erroneous as a matter of law.

We have carefully considered appellant’s, contentions in the light of the record, briefs, and oral arguments and concluded that no reversible error exists. Accordingly we must affirm.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 So. 2d 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deredonda-v-harlan-fladistctapp-1965.