Derechinsky v. Epstein

131 A. 922, 99 N.J. Eq. 447, 14 Stock. 447, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 534
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 1, 1926·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Derechinsky v. Epstein, 131 A. 922, 99 N.J. Eq. 447, 14 Stock. 447, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 534 (N.J. 1926).

131 A. 922 (Derechinsky v. Epstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glorsky v. Wexler
59 A.2d 233 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Gilbert v. Pennington Trap Rock Co.
39 A.2d 647 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Brown v. Royal Battery Corp.
25 A.2d 203 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Marneil Realty Corp. v. Twin Brook Realty Corp.
181 A. 882 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Warren v. New Jersey Zinc Co.
173 A. 128 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
Lettieri v. Mistretta
139 A. 514 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)
K.S.S. Realty Co. v. Ostroff
135 A. 869 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)