Derdoski v. Brecht

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Derdoski v. Brecht

289 N.W. 829, 206 Minn. 598, 1940 Minn. LEXIS 720

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 5, 1940·No. No. 32,197.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is another arising from the accident involved in Schweikert v. Peters Sausage Co. 206 Minn. 596, 289 N. W. 828, the opinion in which is filed herewith. Plaintiff, driver of the truck, upon suing Brecht, owner and driver of the sedan, met the latter’s counterclaim, upon which the jury found for Brecht and awarded him damages. For the reason stated in the other case, the order denying plaintiff’s blended motion must be affirmed.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case is another arising from the accident involved in Schweikert v. Peters Sausage Co. 206 Minn. 596, 289 N. W. 828, the opinion in which is filed herewith. Plaintiff, driver of the truck, upon suing Brecht, owner and driver of the sedan, met the latter’s counterclaim, upon which the jury found for Brecht and awarded him damages. For the reason stated in the other case, the order denying plaintiff’s blended motion must be affirmed.

So ordered.

Derdoski v. Brecht, 289 N.W. 829, 206 Minn. 598, 1940 Minn. LEXIS 720 (Mich. 1940).

Pincite

289 N.W. 829 (Derdoski v. Brecht) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related