Derby v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Derby v. State

446 S.W.3d 261, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036, 2014 WL 4589826

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 2014·No. No. ED 101128·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Adam Derby appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Adam Derby appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Derby v. State, 446 S.W.3d 261, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036, 2014 WL 4589826 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

446 S.W.3d 261 (Derby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.