Derby v. Owens
This text of 96 S.E.2d 851 (Derby v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff’s assignments of error relate to the charge. Particularly, he contends that even in the absence of a request the judge committed reversible error in failing 'to instruct the jury that the plaintiff had a life expectancy of 15.27 years according to the mortuary table (G.S. 8-46) which he had introduced in evidence. Although the charge did not contain a direct reference to the plaintiff’s life expectancy, the court did instruct the jury to take into consideration all the evidence bearing on the issue, including the plaintiff’s age. The court, with clarity and accuracy, applied to the evidence in the case rules of law as they have been approved by this Court.
In the judgment we find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 S.E.2d 851, 245 N.C. 591, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derby-v-owens-nc-1957.