Derby v. Novak

Appellate Court of Illinois

Derby v. Novak

195 Ill. App. 36

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 6, 1915·No. Gen. No. 20,596·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Brokers, § 71*—what is not defense to action for compensation. In a suit for broker’s commissions, the fact that the broker recorded or caused to be recorded the written contract for the exchange of property, without authority from either the buyer or seller so to do, would not alone bar the broker’s right to recover if he was otherwise entitled thereto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Brokers, § 71*—what is not defense to action for compensation. In a suit for broker’s commissions, the fact that the broker recorded or caused to be recorded the written contract for the exchange of property, without authority from either the buyer or seller so to do, would not alone bar the broker’s right to recover if he was otherwise entitled thereto.

Derby v. Novak, 195 Ill. App. 36 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

195 Ill. App. 36 (Derby v. Novak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.