Derby v. Novak

Appellate Court of Illinois

Derby v. Novak

195 Ill. App. 36

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 6, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,596

StatusPublished

This text of 195 Ill. App. 36 (Derby v. Novak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Derby v. Novak, 195 Ill. App. 36 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Brokers, § 71*—what is not defense to action for compensation. In a suit for broker’s commissions, the fact that the broker recorded or caused to be recorded the written contract for the exchange of property, without authority from either the buyer or seller so to do, would not alone bar the broker’s right to recover if he was otherwise entitled thereto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Brokers, § 71*—what is not defense to action for compensation. In a suit for broker’s commissions, the fact that the broker recorded or caused to be recorded the written contract for the exchange of property, without authority from either the buyer or seller so to do, would not alone bar the broker’s right to recover if he was otherwise entitled thereto.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 Ill. App. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derby-v-novak-illappct-1915.