Derby v. Newton

4 P.2d 314, 138 Or. 6, 1931 Ore. LEXIS 241
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 3, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 4 P.2d 314 (Derby v. Newton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Derby v. Newton, 4 P.2d 314, 138 Or. 6, 1931 Ore. LEXIS 241 (Or. 1931).

Opinion

BEAN, C. J.

A motion to dismiss the appeal herein, on the grounds that the appellants failed to prepare and file a bill of exceptions within the time allowed by statute and that they failed to justify the surety in their undetraking on appeal, was filed on December 9,1930. Appellants were permitted to file a new undertaking, which was filed January 13, 1931, and the motion to dismiss was denied, with permission to renew the same at the time of the argument. Counsel for respondent moved to dismiss the appeal for the reason that no transcript had been filed which contained a copy of the judgment appealed from.

*7 The transcript on appeal contains the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the trial court, but no copy of the judgment in the cause. In so far as the record shows, there has not been any judgment-rendered in the trial court from which an appeal could be taken.(

Section 7-507, Oregon Code 1930, directs that upon the appeal being perfected the appellant shall, within thirty days thereafter, file with the clerk of the appellate court a transcript or such an abstract as the law or rules of the appellate court may require of so much of the record as may be necessary to intelligibly present the question to be decided by the appellate tribunal “together with a copy of the judgment or decree appealed from, the notice of appeal, and proof of service thereof, and of the undertaking on appeal; * * S» ? ?

The transcript provided by the statute is a jurisdictional matter and a copy of the judgment or decree appealed from must be contained therein in order to confer jurisdiction upon this court.

The appeal will, therefore, be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schaefer v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
120 P.2d 235 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1941)
In Re Cooke's Estate
115 P.2d 302 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1941)
Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. Bounds
88 S.W.2d 836 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1935)
McInnis v. Atlantic Investment Corp.
4 P.2d 314 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 P.2d 314, 138 Or. 6, 1931 Ore. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derby-v-newton-or-1931.