Derby v. Framingham & Lowell Railroad

119 Mass. 516, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 78
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 14, 1876·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

A railroad corporation has no right to take and appropriate to its own use lands of any person without a strict compliance with the provisions of the statutes which authorize it so to do. The Gen. Sts. c. 63, § 19, expressly provide that lands without the limits of its railroad shall not be taken without permission of the owner, unless the county commissioners “ first prescribe the limits within which the same may be taken.” As no such limits were prescribed by the commissioners before the respondent in this case filed its location over the land in question, it acquired no right, against the will of the owner, in any part of the land outside the limits of its road; so much of this land as had not been conveyed to the corporation by the owner remained his ; and no reason is shown why he should not have a decree [518] under the Gen. Sts. c. 63, §§ 43, 44, compelling the corporation to erect suitable fences between his land and its railroad.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Derby v. Framingham & Lowell Railroad, 119 Mass. 516, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 78 (Mass. 1876).

119 Mass. 516 (Derby v. Framingham & Lowell Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Byfield v. City of Newton
141 N.E. 658 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Lajoie v. City of Lowell
214 Mass. 8 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Harding v. Biggs
52 N.E. 1060 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Hampden Paint & Chemical Co. v. Springfield, Athol & Northeastern Railroad
124 Mass. 118 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)