DeRaismes Hose Co. No. 1 v. City of New York

129 A.D. 917, 114 N.Y.S. 1124

This text of 129 A.D. 917 (DeRaismes Hose Co. No. 1 v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeRaismes Hose Co. No. 1 v. City of New York, 129 A.D. 917, 114 N.Y.S. 1124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

It may well be that the plaintiff has a cause of action under our [918]*918judgment in Jones Hook & Ladder Co. No. 1 v. City of New York (118 App. Div. 896). But this judgment cannot stand because there is not sufficient proof of the alleged contract to pay for the forage. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hook v. City of New York
118 A.D. 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.D. 917, 114 N.Y.S. 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deraismes-hose-co-no-1-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1908.