Deputy v. Dr. J. Conlan

189 A.3d 1290
CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 12, 2018
Docket269, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 189 A.3d 1290 (Deputy v. Dr. J. Conlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deputy v. Dr. J. Conlan, 189 A.3d 1290 (Del. 2018).

Opinion

Gary F. Traynor, Justice

This appeal is from the Superior Court's order of June 20, 2017, granting summary judgment to the defendant-below/appellee, Dr. J. Conlan, in a consolidated action. 1 Having considered the parties' briefs on appeal and the Superior Court record, the Court has concluded that the appeal must be dismissed, without prejudice, for the appellant's failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 when filing an appeal from an interlocutory order. The Superior Court's order on appeal did not resolve the action against the State defendants-James Welch and Thomas Carroll-and was not certified as a final judgment under Superior Court Civil Rule 54b). 2 In the absence of the Rule 54(b) certification, the appeal is interlocutory.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED without notice, sua sponte , under Supreme Court Rule 29(c). The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrison v. Ramunno
730 A.2d 653 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 A.3d 1290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deputy-v-dr-j-conlan-del-2018.