Depue v. George D. Salmon Co.

106 A. 379, 92 N.J.L. 550, 7 Gummere 550, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 207
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 3, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 106 A. 379 (Depue v. George D. Salmon Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Depue v. George D. Salmon Co., 106 A. 379, 92 N.J.L. 550, 7 Gummere 550, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 207 (N.J. 1919).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

This is an action to recover for injuries to children of tender years who, while walking on the highway, were struck by the defendant company’s automobile. Judgment was entered both against the company and its employe, who was acting as chauffeur. No appeal is taken by the employe. The only question raised is whether the defendant company is legally liable for his act or default. He was at the time on his way home after his day’s work was done. By the arrangement between him and his employer, the defendant company, he was entitled to use the automobile to take him to his home at night and from his home to business in the morning. The object was to enable him to reach his place of employment at an earlier hour than he otherwise could. The manager of the company, George G. Salmon, testified that at the time of year when the accident happened their work was heavy and the employe had to be there earlier than the ordinary business hours.

This case is governed by the rule of Cicalese v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 75 N. J. L. 897, 900. We there said: “The relation of master and servant continues during the carriage of the servant to and from his work, when done by the master or with his consent, where from the character of the service such transportation is beneficial both to the master and servant.” That is the present case.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Kalisch, Black, White, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zelasko v. Refrigerated Food Express
608 A.2d 231 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1992)
Cucci v. Jaldini
358 A.2d 201 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Baker Driveaway Co. v. Clark
162 F.2d 181 (Fourth Circuit, 1947)
Micieli v. Erie Railroad Co.
33 A.2d 586 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1943)
Boyce v. Greer
15 So. 2d 404 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1943)
Ely v. Rice Bros.
167 S.W.2d 355 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1942)
Meyn v. Dulaney-Miller Auto Co.
191 S.E. 558 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1937)
Tidal Pipe Line Co. v. Black
1932 OK 817 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. Hicks
285 U.S. 502 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Hunter v. Atlantic City Electric Co.
7 N.J. Misc. 725 (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 1929)
Hill v. Decatur Ice & Coal Co.
122 So. 338 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Seney v. Kaufman
4 Balt. C. Rep. 636 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Fredman v. Safier
5 N.J. Misc. 459 (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 1927)
Elliason v. Western Coal & Coke Co.
202 N.W. 485 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1925)
Echols v. Hurt
1925 OK 14 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A. 379, 92 N.J.L. 550, 7 Gummere 550, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/depue-v-george-d-salmon-co-nj-1919.