Dept. of Social Services Division of Child Support v. Nasiem Shabazz El

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 2024
Docket24-1457
StatusUnpublished

This text of Dept. of Social Services Division of Child Support v. Nasiem Shabazz El (Dept. of Social Services Division of Child Support v. Nasiem Shabazz El) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dept. of Social Services Division of Child Support v. Nasiem Shabazz El, (4th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1457 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1457

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT CENTRAL VIRGINIA DISTRICT OFFICE; ARTHUR MISKIMON; SADE BATTLE,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

NASIEM AHMAD SHABAZZ EL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00081-RCY)

Submitted: October 22, 2024 Decided: October 24, 2024

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nasiem Ahmad Shabazz El, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1457 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Nasiem Ahmad Shabazz El seeks to appeal the district court’s order sua sponte

remanding the underlying action to the state court from which it was removed. Subject to

exceptions not applicable here, “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which

it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); see E.D.

ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc., 722 F.3d 574, 579-83 (4th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, we dismiss

the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc.
722 F.3d 574 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dept. of Social Services Division of Child Support v. Nasiem Shabazz El, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dept-of-social-services-division-of-child-support-v-nasiem-shabazz-el-ca4-2024.