DEPT. OF LABOR & EMP. SEC. v. Vaughan

411 So. 2d 294
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 22, 1982
DocketAD-497
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 411 So. 2d 294 (DEPT. OF LABOR & EMP. SEC. v. Vaughan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DEPT. OF LABOR & EMP. SEC. v. Vaughan, 411 So. 2d 294 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

411 So.2d 294 (1982)

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, Appellant,
v.
Curtis VAUGHAN, Lotspeich Interior Contractors and Crum & Forester Insurance Co., Appellees.

No. AD-497.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 22, 1982.

Michael J. Rudicell, Tallahassee, for appellant.

*295 Stephen L. Rosen of Morris & Rosen, Tampa, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the deputy's 1981 order awarding interest at six per cent per annum on payments due but unpaid claimant since 1978 from the Workers' Compensation Trust Fund pursuant to section 440.15(1)(e), Florida Statutes (1981). To partially offset the effects of inflation since the award of compensation benefits in earlier years, that statute directs the Fund to supplement the compensation still to be paid under such an award by adding five percent times the number of years since the date of injury. Tardiness of payment from the Fund cancels to a degree the beneficial purposes of the statute, which the deputy's order attempts to remedy through an additional award of interest. While the purpose may be commended to the legislature, we are bound by the general rule that the State is not liable for interest on its debts unless consented to by act of the legislature or by lawful contract of its executive officers. Treadway v. Terrell, 117 Fla. 838, 158 So. 512 (1935); Department of Revenue v. Goembel, 382 So.2d 783 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). To characterize the provisions of chapter 440 as for some purposes a "contract" between the employee, employer, and carrier, Sullivan v. Mayo, 121 So.2d 424 (Fla. 1960), does not impose contractual obligations on the Division of Workers' Compensation or on the Fund which it administers. Cf. Division of Labor v. Taylor, IRC Order 2-3189 (1977), cert. den., 358 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1978).

REVERSED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and McCORD and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Clearwater v. Acker
755 So. 2d 597 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Henderson v. Henderson
1999 ND 156 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
Saari v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
1999 ND 144 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
Acker v. City of Clearwater
755 So. 2d 651 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Effertz v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation Bureau
481 N.W.2d 223 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
Winter Garden Citrus v. Parrish
438 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Knight v. City of Miami
421 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
411 So. 2d 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dept-of-labor-emp-sec-v-vaughan-fladistctapp-1982.