Dep't of Human Servs. v. C. A. (In re D. A.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Dep't of Human Servs. v. C. A. (In re D. A.)

424 P.3d 830, 293 Or. App. 606

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedAugust 29, 2018

DocketA167127 (Control); A167128

StatusPublished

This text of 424 P.3d 830 (Dep't of Human Servs. v. C. A. (In re D. A.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dep't of Human Servs. v. C. A. (In re D. A.), 424 P.3d 830, 293 Or. App. 606 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*607Mother and father appeal juvenile court judgments that asserted jurisdiction over their two children, D and K. The court took jurisdiction over the children based on allegations that (1) D has medical problems requiring treatment that parents are unwilling to provide, (2) after those problems surfaced, *831parents were rejecting the involvement of child protective services and refusing to allow access to K, and (3) parents' chaotic lifestyle interferes with their ability to safely parent. On appeal, parents argue that the record is legally insufficient to support the court's assertion of jurisdiction on any of those bases. In response, the Department of Human Services concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish jurisdiction over either child and that the judgments should be reversed. We agree, accept the concession, and reverse the jurisdictional judgments.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*607Mother and father appeal juvenile court judgments that asserted jurisdiction over their two children, D and K. The court took jurisdiction over the children based on allegations that (1) D has medical problems requiring treatment that parents are unwilling to provide, (2) after those problems surfaced, *831parents were rejecting the involvement of child protective services and refusing to allow access to K, and (3) parents' chaotic lifestyle interferes with their ability to safely parent. On appeal, parents argue that the record is legally insufficient to support the court's assertion of jurisdiction on any of those bases. In response, the Department of Human Services concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish jurisdiction over either child and that the judgments should be reversed. We agree, accept the concession, and reverse the jurisdictional judgments.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

424 P.3d 830, 293 Or. App. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dept-of-human-servs-v-c-a-in-re-d-a-orctapp-2018.