Dept. of Human Services v. M. C.
This text of 320 Or. App. 623 (Dept. of Human Services v. M. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1). Submitted May 31; vacated and remanded as to order that mother submit to a psychological evaluation, otherwise affirmed June 29, 2022
In the Matter of K. C., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. M. C., aka M. H., Appellant. Deschutes County Circuit Court 21JU03179; A177558
Beth M. Bagley, Judge. Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate Section, and Sean Connor, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before James, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Joyce, Judge. JAMES, P. J. Vacated and remanded as to order that mother submit to a psychological evaluation; otherwise affirmed. 624 Dept. of Human Services v. M. C.
JAMES, P. J. Mother appeals from a judgment of jurisdiction and disposition. Mother does not challenge the portion of the judgment taking jurisdiction over child. Rather, she con- tends that the juvenile court erred in ordering her to par- ticipate in a psychological evaluation. The Department of Human Services concedes that, in light of our recent deci- sion in Dept. of Human Services v. W. C. T., 314 Or App 743, 501 P3d 44 (2021), the court erred. The concession is well taken. Based on the concession, the parties are in agree- ment that the disposition portion of the judgment should be vacated and remanded to delete the order that mother par- ticipate in a psychological evaluation. Vacated and remanded as to order that mother sub- mit to a psychological evaluation; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 Or. App. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dept-of-human-services-v-m-c-orctapp-2022.