Dept. of Human Services v. E. D.
Opinion
Submitted September 3, reversed November 24, 2021
In the Matter of A. V. D., a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent,
v. E. D., Appellant.
Coos County Circuit Court 20JU06151; A175571
500 P3d 85
Megan Jacquot, Judge. Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate Section, and Tiffany Keast, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense, Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Stacy M. Chaffin, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge.
PER CURIAM Reversed.
Cite as 315 Or App 822 (2021) 823
PER CURIAM Mother appeals a judgment establishing juvenilecourt jurisdiction over 16-year-old A. In four assignments of error, mother argues that the evidence is legally insufficient to warrant the juvenile court’s jurisdiction, because the conditions and circumstances alleged by the Department of Human Services (DHS) do not expose A to a current, nonspeculative risk of serious loss or injury. ORS 419B.100(1)(c). DHS concedes the error. We agree, accept the concession, and reverse the jurisdictional judgment.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
500 P.3d 85 (Dept. of Human Services v. E. D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.