Dept. of Human Services v. C. A. G.

316 Or. App. 115

• Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
• Decided: December 1, 2021
• Docket: A175958
• Status: Published

Opinion

Submitted October 28, affirmed December 1, 2021, petition for review denied February 3, 2022 (369 Or 211)

In the Matter of L. A. G., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C. A. G., aka C. A. W., Appellant. Lincoln County Circuit Court 19JU02103; A175958 (Control) In the Matter of X. F. G., aka X. G., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C. A. G., aka C. A. W., Appellant. Lincoln County Circuit Court 19JU02102; A175959 In the Matter of K. J. G., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C. A. G., Appellant. Lincoln County Circuit Court 19JU02104; A175960 In the Matter of R. M. G., aka R. G., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, 116 Dept. of Human Services v. C. A. G.

v. C. A. G., aka C. A. W., Appellant. Lincoln County Circuit Court 19JU02101; A175961 500 P3d 770

Sheryl Bachart, Judge. George W. Kelly filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Inge G. Wells, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Cite as 316 Or App 115 (2021) 117

PER CURIAM In this consolidated appeal, mother appeals judg- ments terminating her parental rights to four of her chil- dren. Our review is de novo. ORS 19.415(3)(a). Having con- sidered the record in light of the parties’ arguments, we are in agreement with the juvenile court’s assessment of the evidence, as set forth in its careful and detailed opinions as to each child in these matters, and are persuaded that the judgments on appeal should be affirmed. Affirmed.