Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. CNS Int'l Ministries

136 S. Ct. 2006, 195 L. Ed. 2d 210, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 168, 84 U.S.L.W. 3630, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3160
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 16, 2016
DocketNo. 15–775.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 136 S. Ct. 2006 (Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. CNS Int'l Ministries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. CNS Int'l Ministries, 136 S. Ct. 2006, 195 L. Ed. 2d 210, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 168, 84 U.S.L.W. 3630, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3160 (U.S. 2016).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in light of Zubik v. Burwell, 578 U.S. ---- (2016). Nothing in the Zubik opinion, or in the opinions or orders of the courts below, is to affect the ability of the Government to ensure that women covered by respondents' health plans 'obtain, without cost, the full range of FDA approved contraceptives.' Wheaton College v. Burwell, 573 U.S. ----, ---- (2014) (slip op., at 1). Through this litigation, respondents have made the Government aware of their view that they meet 'the requirements for exemption from the contraceptive coverage requirement on religious grounds.' Id., at --- - (slip op., at 2). Nothing in the Zubik opinion, or in the opinions or orders of the *2007courts below, 'precludes the Government from relying on this notice, to the extent it considers it necessary, to facilitate the provision of full contraceptive coverage' going forward. Ibid. Because the Government may rely on this notice, the Government may not impose taxes or penalties on respondents for failure to provide the relevant notice.

Justice SOTOMAYOR, with whom Justice GINSBURG joins, concurs in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case for the reasons expressed in Zubik v. Burwell, 578 U.S. ---- (2016) (Sotomayor, J., concurring).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S. Ct. 2006, 195 L. Ed. 2d 210, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 168, 84 U.S.L.W. 3630, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dept-of-health-human-servs-v-cns-intl-ministries-scotus-2016.