Deprycker v. State
This text of 486 So. 2d 57 (Deprycker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Concededly, the defendant-appellant pled guilty based on a misapprehension of the possible sentence induced by the state’s miscalculation of the appropriate scoring under the guidelines. When the error was discovered before sentencing, he moved to withdraw the plea and now challenges the denial of that motion. We reverse on the authority of Tobey v. State, 458 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). See also Ritchie v. State, 458 So.2d 877 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Banks v. State, 136 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962); see generally Forbert v. State, 437 So.2d 1079 (Fla.1983). Accordingly, the judgment under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to permit the withdrawal of the plea.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
486 So. 2d 57, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 837, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deprycker-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.