Depriest v. 1717-19 West End Assoc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Depriest v. 1717-19 West End Assoc.

DecidedMarch 19, 1997

Docket01A01-9609-CH-00428

StatusPublished

This text of Depriest v. 1717-19 West End Assoc. (Depriest v. 1717-19 West End Assoc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Depriest v. 1717-19 West End Assoc., (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

WILLIAM T. DePRIEST, GATES- PATE-McDANIEL, HENRY H. ) ) FILED HEADDEN, JOEL P. MORRIS, ) MAURICE PINSON, RICHARD R. ) March 19, 1997 STANDEL, JR., and W. O. VAUGHN, ) JR., ) Cecil W. Crowson ) Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) ) Davidson County Chancery ) No. 90-4942 VS. ) ) Appeal No. ) 01A01-9609-CH-00428 1717-19 WEST END ASSOCIATES, a ) Tennessee Partnership, Mid-Town ) Associates, a Tennessee Partnership, ) O’Hare, Sherrard & Roe, a Tennessee ) Partnership, and John R. Voigt, ) ) Defendants/Appellees. )

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR

The appellees, O’Hare, Sherrod & Roe and John R. Voigt, have filed a respectful petition

to rehear calling attention to a typographical error in the opinion of this Court in which the word,

“cites” was erroneously typed, “cities”.

On its own motion, this Court orders the correction of said order.

Said appellees also complain of the statement in the opinion that their motion for

discretionary costs was unsupported by grounds. It is true, as insisted by said appellees that the

motion was supported by affidavit, but said affidavit related only to the amount of costs (fees)

demanded, and not to facts to justify the allowance of discretionary costs. Said petition to rehear is respectfully denied.

ENTERED ___________, 1997

___________________________________ HENRY F. TODD PRESIDING JUDGE, MIDDLE SECTION

___________________________________ SAMUEL L. LEWIS, JUDGE

___________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

WILLIAM T. DePRIEST, GATES- PATE-McDANIEL, HENRY H. ) ) FILED HEADDEN, JOEL P. MORRIS, ) MAURICE PINSON, RICHARD R. ) March 19, 1997 STANDEL, JR., and W. O. VAUGHN, ) JR., ) Cecil W. Crowson ) Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) ) Davidson County Chancery ) No. 90-4942 VS. ) ) Appeal No. ) 01A01-9609-CH-00428 1717-19 WEST END ASSOCIATES, a ) Tennessee Partnership, Mid-Town ) Associates, a Tennessee Partnership, ) O’Hare, Sherrard & Roe, a Tennessee ) Partnership, and John R. Voigt, ) ) Defendants/Appellees. )

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR

The appellees, O’Hare, Sherrod & Roe and John R. Voigt, have filed a respectful petition

to rehear calling attention to a typographical error in the opinion of this Court in which the word,

“cites” was erroneously typed, “cities”.

On its own motion, this Court orders the correction of said order.

Said appellees also complain of the statement in the opinion that their motion for

discretionary costs was unsupported by grounds. It is true, as insisted by said appellees that the

motion was supported by affidavit, but said affidavit related only to the amount of costs (fees)

demanded, and not to facts to justify the allowance of discretionary costs. Said petition to rehear is respectfully denied.

ENTERED ___________, 1997

___________________________________ HENRY F. TODD PRESIDING JUDGE, MIDDLE SECTION

___________________________________ SAMUEL L. LEWIS, JUDGE

___________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

-2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Depriest v. 1717-19 West End Assoc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/depriest-v-1717-19-west-end-assoc-tennctapp-1997.