Deppe v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

72 S.E. 80, 156 N.C. 56, 1911 N.C. LEXIS 130
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Deppe v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 152 N.C. 79
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 27, 1911·Published

Opinion

Olabk, C. J.

This case was before us, 152 N. C., 79-83, where the facts are fully set out-, and again, 154 N. C., 523.

On this last trial the case was tried in accordance with the principles of law laid down in the two former appeals. The evidence was substantially the same as on the former trials, with the addition of other witnesses, whose evidence was largely cumulative.

Numerous exceptions were taken, but we do not think that discussion of. them is necessary. The learned and impartial judge ruled out much of the plaintiff's testimony and evidently labored to bring the case strictly within the former decisions of this Court in this case. We think he has done so, at least to the extent that no substantial error has been committed which entitles the defendant to still another trial of the case before a jury.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deppe v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 72 S.E. 80, 156 N.C. 56, 1911 N.C. LEXIS 130 (N.C. 1911).

72 S.E. 80 (Deppe v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deppe v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
67 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
Deppe v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
70 S.E. 622 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)