Depotter v. City of Rahway

159 A. 661, 10 N.J. Misc. 533, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 187
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 9, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 159 A. 661 (Depotter v. City of Rahway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Depotter v. City of Rahway, 159 A. 661, 10 N.J. Misc. 533, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 187 (N.J. 1932).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This appears to be an application for an order for the taxation of costs in favor of the prosecutor. In fact there is nothing before the court except the brief and reply brief of counsel for the prosecutor and the brief of counsel of the defendant. There is no state of case or other papers from which the court can obtain the facts. Under such circumstances the application might well and properly be dismissed. Considering, however, the matter upon the merits so far as we can spell out the facts from the briefs, we have reached the conclusion that the motion should be denied.

A rule so adjudging may therefore be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 A. 661, 10 N.J. Misc. 533, 1932 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/depotter-v-city-of-rahway-nj-1932.